In terms of specifications, the Intel Core i9-13900K has more physical cores and threads than AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X, with 24 cores and 16 cores. However, Intel uses a new hybrid core design on this chip, while AMD still uses a traditional processor core design, so the number of threads is the same between the two.

Both processors are equipped with integrated graphics, and Intel’s UHD Graphics 770 is relatively more powerful. AMD’s Radeon integrated graphics are only used for video output and are not capable of heavy tasks such as gaming and video editing.

In terms of thermal design power (TDP), Intel is 125W and AMD is 170W. Both processors can achieve 200W of power from the PSU and motherboard. Although the following test data does not fully represent the accurate performance of these two processors in the real world, at least there can be a more intuitive comparison through numbers.

The post Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Flagship Processor Performance Comparison appeared first on TechGoing.

In the developer’s CPU ranking table, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has become the best choice for Sony PS3 emulator RPCS3. AMD’s latest processors outperform all competitors, including Intel. Also, RPCS3 just got AVX-512 support a few days ago, and luckily for open-source emulators, AMD’s latest Zen 4 microarchitecture supports AVX-512 instructions.
The Sony PlayStation console is built on the Cell processor, containing a common Power core and eight SPEs, or co-processing elements, featuring an instruction set architecture with 128-bit SIMD organization and in-order execution, patented by Sony Electronics. The Cell CPU provides the direct equivalent and large file registers supported by the AVX-512 multicore processor. Additionally, the LLVM compiler can choose the best code path for the compiler to execute, providing a 30% performance boost.

Features of AMD Ryzen 7000 Desktop Processors:

Up to 16 Zen 4 cores and 32 threads

29% performance improvement for single-threaded applications.

New Zen 4 CPU cores (IPC/architectural improvements).

New TSMC 5nm process node and 6nm IOD

Compared with Zen 3, the performance per watt is improved by 25%, the overall performance is improved by more than 35%, and the number of instructions per clock (IPC) is improved by about 13%.

Support AM5 platform with LGA1718 socket

New X670E, X670, B650E, B650 motherboards

Support dual channel DDR5 memory

DDR5-5600 native speed (JEDEC)

28 PCIe lanes (for CPU only)

105-120W TDPs (up to 170W)

While current PC hardware can emulate a Sony PS3 console, RPCS3 can further increase the frames-per-second experience through AMD’s FidelityFX super-resolution technology.

While comparison testing of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPUs to Intel Core i9-13900K is still ongoing, there is a lot of speculation that AMD will dominate the gaming esports market next with the help of AVX-512 support, especially in display With a 30% performance increase.

The post AMD Ryzen 9 7950X with AVX-512 support becomes first choice for running RPCS3 emulator appeared first on TechGoing.

AMD did show official performance numbers for the Ryzen 7000 desktop CPU in Geekbench 5, but those numbers were based on single-threaded tests only. Now we can see the single-core and multi-core performance data.

The two CPUs were tested on the ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Extreme (Ryzen 9 7950X) and MSI X670E ACE (Ryzen 5 7600X) motherboards, but both with 32 GB of DDR5 memory. These are official retail samples, as evidenced by the clock speeds. The 16-core chip runs at slightly more than 5.7 GHz, while the 6-core chip runs closer to 5.4 GHz.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16 Core “Zen 4” Desktop CPU

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X retains the 16 cores and 32 thread count of the previous two generations. The CPU will have an impressive 4.5 GHz base frequency and a boost clock of up to 5.7 GHz (5.85 GHz F-Max), which will make it 200 MHz faster than Intel’s Alder Lake Core i9-12900KS, which has a boost frequency of 5.5 GHz on a single core.

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X 6 Core “Zen 4” Desktop CPU

The Ryzen 5 7600X is 6-core and 12-threaded, with a high base clock of 4.7 GHz and a single-core acceleration frequency of 5.3 GHz. The CPU will also run at 105W TDP (142W PPT), well above its predecessor’s 65W, although again this is the sacrifice you have to make to get faster clock speeds. The CPU will carry 38 MB of cache from the 32 MB L3 and 6 MB L2 on the chip, which will cost $299 and deliver a 5% increase in performance in games over the Core i9-12900K.

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scored 2217 single-core and 24396 multi-core points, while the Ryzen 5 7600X scored 2165 single-core and 11432 multi-core points. In terms of single cores, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPU is 31% better than the Ryzen 9 5950X and definitely beats its predecessor with a 14% performance increase compared to the Core i9-12900K. The CPU is indeed 4% lower than the Core i9-13900K, but the Intel chip also runs at a much higher power of up to 350 watts. The Ryzen 5 7600X performs over 30% better than the Ryzen 5 5600X and even outperforms the Core i9-12900K.

Both chips are more than 40% ahead of their predecessors in multi-threaded tests. The Ryzen 9 7950X is also 41% faster than the Intel Core i9-12900K, and the Ryzen 5 7600X is comparable to the Intel Core i5-12600K, which has more cores and threads. These are very strong numbers, and we can’t wait to see these chips hit the market on September 27 so users can enjoy a huge performance boost.

The post AMD Ryzen 9 7950X/5 7600X scores revealed: single-core improvement of 30% multi-core 40% appeared first on TechGoing.

According to the newly revealed score data, AMD R9 7950X (16 cores and 32 threads) and Intel i9-13900K (24 cores and 32 threads) two top processors played hard to separate.

Geekbench scores show that both processors have a single-core score of around 2200 and a multi-core score of around 24000, with AMD slightly higher by 1~2%.

The CPU-Z score revealed by @OneRaichu shows that the AMD R9 7950X has a multi-threaded score of 15,645, which is slightly lower than the Intel i9-13900K by 8%.

The AMD R9 7950X has a frequency of 4.5-5.7GHz, comes with 80MB of cache, 170W TDP, and is priced at $699 (about RMB 4830.09).

The Intel i9-13900K is expected to be released in the early hours of September 28, Beijing time, and available on October 20.

The post AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel i9-13900K processor score comparison is out appeared first on TechGoing.

As shown above, the parameters and prices for the first four models of AMD’s Ryzen 7000 series processors are as follows

R9 7950X: 16C32T, 4.5-5.7GHz, 80MB cache, 170W TDP, $699 (about RMB 4809.12 approx.)

R9 7900X: 12C24T, 4.7-5.6GHz, 76MB cache, 170W TDP, $549 (about RMB 3777.12)

R7 7700X: 8C16T, 4.5-5.4GHz, 40MB cache, 105W TDP, $399 (about RMB 2745.12)

R5 7600X: 6C12T, 4.7-5.3GHz, 38MB cache, 105W TDP, $299 (about RMB. 2057.12)

The Ryzen 7000 series processors use a 5nm process and Zen4 architecture. Officials say that the IPC has increased by 13%, and coupled with the 5.7GHz frequency, the single-core performance has increased by 29%.

According to AMD’s test data, the Geekbench single-core running points of the first four models of the AMD Ryzen 7000 series all exceeded Intel’s current flagship processor i9-12900K.

AMD compared the R9 7950X to the i9-12900K, and in terms of gaming performance, the AMD model was up 23% in DOTA2; in terms of creativity, the AMD model was 63% ahead on V-Ray.

The post AMD announces Ryzen 7000 series processors: 16-core R9 7950X up to 5.7GHz appeared first on TechGoing.

● AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16 Core “Zen 4” Desktop CPU

First, we start with the flagship model. AMD Ryzen 9 7950 retains the 16-core and 32-thread count of the previous two generations. The CPU has a base clock frequency of 4.5 GHz and an accelerated clock frequency of up to 5.7 GHz, which would make it 200 MHz faster than Intel’s Alder Lake Core i9-12900KS, which has a 5.5 GHz RWD on a single core.

It looks like AMD is squeezing all the performance out of the 170W TDP (230W PPT) for the Ryzen 9 chip. As for cache, the CPU comes with 80 MB, including 64 MB from L3 (32 MB per CCD) and 16 MB from L2 (1 MB per core).

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X 8 Core “Zen 4” Desktop CPU

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is 8 cores and 16 threads. AMD has positioned it as the best choice for gamers, so the CPU will have a base clock of 4.5 GHz and an accelerated clock of 5.4 GHz, but with a low TDP (142W PPT). The CPU will get a 40 MB cache, including 32 MB L3 from a single CCD and 8 MB L2 from the Zen 4 core.

The two AMD Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 desktop CPUs tested here are both ES samples and appear to be unaffected by the issues reported yesterday. We don’t know the clocks they were running on or the test configurations, but it was mentioned that these chips scored around 750-780 in the single-core test. Using this as a basis for a multi-threaded comparison, we arrive at the following figures.

So, in the best case scenario, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X will have multi-threaded performance over 40% faster than the Ryzen 9 5950X, and the Ryzen 7 7700X over 20% faster than the Ryzen 7 5800X. This is a huge difference in multithreaded performance gains (generation over generation) between the two CPUs, again pointing to the fact that these are not final results but only early performance numbers. Yesterday’s results also showed a 26% multi-threaded performance improvement for Cinebench R20, so the 22% multi-threaded performance improvement here is not far off.

The post AMD Ryzen 9 7950X/Ryzen 7 7700X: Benchmark performance Scores revealed appeared first on TechGoing.